Is treatment with either Synulox or Cephaguard intramammary preparations for sub-clinically affected quarters more effective at reducing the incidence of re-infection in young cows (lactation no. 1 & 2) than in older cows (lactation no. 3-9)?.
(Reference - Library use only)
ELECTIVES 1997 NO.66
1 available
Description
Copies
| Location | Call Number | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hawkshead Library - Stack | ELECTIVES 1997 NO.66 | On Shelf |
Citations
Roberts, A. Is treatment with either Synulox or Cephaguard intramammary preparations for sub-clinically affected quarters more effective at reducing the incidence of re-infection in young cows (lactation no. 1 & 2) than in older cows (lactation no. 3-9)? .
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Roberts, Alwyn. Is Treatment With Either Synulox or Cephaguard Intramammary Preparations for Sub-clinically Affected Quarters More Effective At Reducing the Incidence of Re-infection in Young Cows (lactation No. 1 & 2) Than in Older Cows (lactation No. 3-9)?. .
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Roberts, Alwyn. Is Treatment With Either Synulox or Cephaguard Intramammary Preparations for Sub-clinically Affected Quarters More Effective At Reducing the Incidence of Re-infection in Young Cows (lactation No. 1 & 2) Than in Older Cows (lactation No. 3-9)? .
Harvard Citation (style guide)Roberts, A. (n.d.). Is treatment with either synulox or cephaguard intramammary preparations for sub-clinically affected quarters more effective at reducing the incidence of re-infection in young cows (lactation no. 1 & 2) than in older cows (lactation no. 3-9)?
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Roberts, Alwyn. Is Treatment With Either Synulox or Cephaguard Intramammary Preparations for Sub-clinically Affected Quarters More Effective At Reducing the Incidence of Re-infection in Young Cows (lactation No. 1 & 2) Than in Older Cows (lactation No. 3-9)?