A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease
(Elective)

Book Cover
Format
Elective
Status
Hawkshead Library - Stack
ELECTIVE 2014 NO. 216
1 available

Description

Loading Description...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
Hawkshead Library - StackELECTIVE 2014 NO. 216On Shelf

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (Style Guide)

Trusa, L. A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)

Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)

Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease. .

UCL Harvard Citation (Style Guide)

Trusa, L. (n.d.). A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (Style Guide)

Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease.

Note: Citations contain only title, author, edition, and publisher. Only UCL Harvard citations contain the year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of May 2025.

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

Staff View

Loading Staff View.