A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease
(Elective)
ELECTIVE 2014 NO. 216
1 available
Description
Copies
| Location | Call Number | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hawkshead Library - Stack | ELECTIVE 2014 NO. 216 | On Shelf |
Citations
Trusa, L. A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease. .
UCL Harvard Citation (Style Guide)Trusa, L. (n.d.). A comparison of canine cardiac patients diagnosed by first opinion and tertiary referral cardiologists: evidence for referral bias in canine cardiovascular disease.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (Style Guide)Trusa, Lauren. A Comparison of Canine Cardiac Patients Diagnosed By First Opinion and Tertiary Referral Cardiologists: Evidence for Referral Bias in Canine Cardiovascular Disease.
